If Minerva Redaksjonen Redaksjonsråd Cultural faste writers Tidligere utgaver Minerva in the media

If Minerva Redaksjonen Redaksjonsråd Cultural faste writers Tidligere utgaver Minerva in the media say about Minerva Skrive for Minerva Contact us My side Tidligere utgaver pall life science Abonnement Newsletter Contact
Les også Øyvind Strommen kritikk: Konspirasjoner if Israel og 22/7. Ola Tuna Flinders Artikkel in New Norsk Tidsskrift can leses her. Cathrine Holst (Editor in New Norsk Tidsskrift) response to kritikken can leses her.
I'm not insinuating that Israel pall life science would be involved and I do not believe that Israel would have been behind Breivik's pall life science attack if one should speculate. But I discuss some arguments are apparently enough for Strommen think that I support of these arguments.
I for a discussion of alternative interpretations of what may have happened. I address them as Breivik pall life science claims to have been inspired by, I take up the interests of some actors, I bring up the network that Breivik claims to have had and I covers who may possibly have funded him.
I write then: to discuss in terms of inspiration and interests is not enough to understand what happened. One has to discuss his specific network and possible funders who may have been involved.
Right wing extremists I begin with a discussion of some anti-jihadists, including Robert Spencer and Atlas Shrugs network side (Pamela Geller) that Anders Behring Breivik pall life science claims to have been inspired by. Geller and Spencer is the center of Israeli-American activists in the United States, and former U.S. Ambassador to the UN John Bolton has written a preface to their recent book about Obama and "The Post-American Presidency".
Geller and Spencer sees itself as the defender of Israel in the United States and to speak in terms of "israelsk-American høyreekstremisme" is not unreasonable when they are far to the right of the Norwegian political spectrum.
But I then type in a konkluderande sense: that there is nothing to suggest that these anti-jihadists "would be in the techno kind of plan that inkluderer Breivik". There is no direct causal link between pall life science the rise of extremist web pages and Breivik's attacks.
It was primarily a central writer, Barry Rubin, who argued that when Norway supports terrorism in Israel (ie talking to Hamas and supports a Palestinian state), it is natural pall life science that this leads to terrorism in Norway. pall life science
Jerusalem Post apologized, as I write, but Rubin's comments were quite unpleasant, which has led some writers to believe that Israel may have been involved in the operation. pall life science It has been pointed out that an Israeli terrorist attack in 1946 against the British occupation took place precisely on July 22. These writers have added 22 July symbolic significance. I then type
"On the hawser of at it there is a certain logikk in Disse argumentene, er dette ikke techno explanation. It er ikke tilstrekkelig the Soke answers in Breivik's anti-jihadisme og voldsretorikk or mulige israelske interests or deres feiring by bomb attacked. At operasjonene ble performed on a bestemt date with symbolsk comprehension you either ikke noe evidence. Kanskje was so at Breivik wanted Hedre the første korsfarernes seier in Jerusalem on 22. juli, 1099. It s either ikke nok on the bowsprit on at Breivik Blitt preget of NATO bombing of Serbia in the Kosovo war. Serberne ble fornedret, og la dette grunnen for a Serbian revansjisme that shell have meant myeloma for Breivik, but dette can in Horrmundsgården ikke forklare hvordan a nordmann ble capable on sprenge regjeringskvartalet og skyte nærmere 100 people on Utøya (69 drepte). Inspirasjon og inter-esser can ikke g in a tiltrekkelig explanation. Ikke nor Breivik ulykkelige forhold til his father can forklare his ufølsomhet. His trening with overflow og use of baptism (steroids) may have made him more ufølsom, but neither dette ikke nok s. A person foler hatred og who lest seg til nødvendigheten of the drepe can ikke bare going out at the gate, on the skyte 100 children. "
I then write that Breivik's violence would require a brutalization, eg a war experience, or paramilitary training, and I point out that one has to go to the network that Breivik claimed to be part of.
If we assume that he really had a network (as he writes), this will be interesting. Of course, one can also imagine the possibility of Breivik's entire manifesto is fictional, but then is forced to answer a few other questions: pall life science why he knows certain things that you normally do not know whether you have not studied the world properly and how he has managed to implement what he did without any psychological support. One can at least say that it is unusual.
Any network What I argue is that inspiration and interests are not enough to explain Breivik's attacks. One can not argue that "inspiration" pall life science (ie, anti-jihadists) directly leads to an attack and you can not argue that the interests (such as those discussing about Israeli interests) provides answers